logo

An Alternative to Publicly Funding of Publicly Displayed Works of Art


In a previous article I wrote about the fact that no I don't think tax payer dollars should be spent on the arts. And lets be honest if an artist is making enough from their artwork they are paying some of those dollars.

I could go on several crazy rants right about now:

- Government needs to shrink in general.

- Government picking winners and losers needing to happening.

- Nobody get me started on how much it no doubt hurts the bottom line of every artist and indeed every person in any industry who didn't get picked by the government as a winner when their potential customers have to work harder and take home less because their tax dollars are going to pay for public art projects that they in many cases don't even like.

Here's a crazy alternative. Use the city streets the same way someone might use an art gallery. Every place that anyone is thinking �lets put a nice piece of art there� instead of buying art, ask any artists who are willing and intrested in doing so donate or loan a piece of art on either a short or long term basis but if an artist donates or loans a piece of their art for display then the information for people to contact them to buy some of their artwork (maybe even including that piece) have to be clearly and visibly displayed both around the piece and online.

The idea is that rather than paying for gallery space or as much gallery space to advertise an artist then has the option to place their art out in public view at no cost to them.

For anyone who thinks this sounds crazy I know an artist who did a picture of an animal and loaned it to a local cat shelter with the understanding that they would clearly display for and offer her business card to people on the off chance someone wanted to have a picture of their pet painted. Eventually she did take her picture out of there, but there was no reason she or other artists who do a type of art more similar to what she was doing couldn't do something similar to that type of thing again.

In all honesty if it's going to cost extra for the tax payer to have those set aside spaces for the art that might get donated or loaned compared to having no art there then no probably that shouldn't even be done and the space should be left empty. So I don't know how those costs should get addressed, but hey if there are privately funded and owned entities that want to take on those costs then I will consider the issue addressed. Ideally the government needs to get it's hands, dollars, and whatever else it shouldn't have in their out of the arts. But there are good alternatives to spending tax money on art that don't have to leave any less art out there. Who know there might even be better art on display this way.

Sorry every person who doesn't like the idea of Government having to get very minimalist and utilitarian in design on how many things, but actually there's something I would consider appropriate about that. Of course I am in favor of setting the temperatures in every capital building to range between 55 and 80 degrees Fahrenheit so while people won't die from extreme temperatures they won't be so comfortable that they are feeling like taking so much time writing whatever the latest bill is that we all know needed to be a lot shorter and have less dollars getting spent and fewer new rules that make everyone's lives harder in the first place, and the tax payer isn't paying anywhere near as much to heat those buildings.

After all if I wanted to start in on conspiracy theories I would probably be accusing whoever it is that wants people to reduce their standards of living in a way that ends with people being kept more easily under government control of being something to do with �minimalism� being a style or life style choice that some how is even a thing when ironically we all know they probably aren't living that way.

By the way for anyone thinking there are any sour grapes I am going to take this chance to point out I do a completely different and unrelated type of art, and the types of artist who's work will usually end up in public displays like are doing something else completely. My issue is the spending of tax payer dollars.

�2012-present E. S. Pfahl. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means - - graphic electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, information storage and retrieval systems - - without written permission of E. S. Pfahl